Obs Gyne Review: Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology https://obstetrics.medresearch.in/index.php/joog <div id="journalDescription-8" class="journalDescription"> <p><em><strong>ISSN: 2455-5444 (Online), 2581-4389 (Print), </strong><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Now Monthly from July 2019</span>, </strong></em><strong>Indexed with Index Copernicus</strong></p> <p>Obsgyne Review: Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology is commencing its publication from July- September 2015. It is bimonthly, peer reviewed open access medical Journal. It is publish montly from July 2019 onword.</p> <p>Obsgyne Review: Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology&nbsp;is published by Siddharth Health Research and social welfare society which is registered under MP Society registration act, 1973.</p> <p>Link for society Registration. <strong><a href="http://www.ijmrr.in/images/download/societypage1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Link 1:</a></strong></p> <p><span style="color: #3366ff;"><strong>Obsgyne Review: Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology&nbsp;is Now Indexed with Index Copernicus</strong>. <a title="ICV Value" href="https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/details?id=44306" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Link</strong></a></span></p> <p>This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without any charges to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.</p> <p>We welcome articles from all medical specialties realted with Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology. We accept, in English Review articles, Research/Original articles, Case Reports, Case series, Research letters &amp; Letters to Editor etc.</p> <p>Our motto to is &nbsp;to provide an international platform to the large volume of research work which in going on all around the world. Our mission is to update medical fraternity with the latest knowledge. We are committed and promise to take this journal to greaterer heights. We request all &nbsp;readers to submit articles for the upcoming issue.</p> <p>&nbsp;We are already indexed with Index Copernicus, Google Scholar, Cross ref, Research Boble, etc. We are making efforts to get indexed with other International and National databases shortly.</p> </div> en-US editor@obstetrics.medresearch.in (Dr D Sharad Gedam) editor.joog@medresearch.in (Mr Mandeep Kapoor, Mob: 9977225727 (10 AM to 5 PM, Mon- Sat)) Tue, 26 May 2020 00:00:00 +0000 OJS http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Effect of daily versus intermittent iron therapy in pregnant women: hematological and pregnancy outcome https://obstetrics.medresearch.in/index.php/joog/article/view/102 <p>Background: The purpose of this study was to compare daily iron supplementation and intermittent iron supplementation in preventing anemia in healthy pregnant women.</p> <p>Material and Method: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. From May 2004 – December 2006, 141 healthy pregnant women without anemia, between 14 - 20 weeks of pregnancy were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Completed data were obtained in 110 patients, 55 in each group. The first group (n = 55) received a 100 mg-ferrous sulfate tablet daily, the second group (n = 55) received a 100 mg-ferrous sulfate tablet two tablets once weekly, respectively till delivery. Serum hemoglobin, ferritin, and iron were measured before and after the supplementation. Paired t and ANOVA tests were used as appropriate.</p> <p>Results: There were no significant differences between the pre- and post-treatment hemoglobin levels (p= 0.871) and serum ferritin levels (p= 0.741) with iron supplementation in the two groups when the maternal hemoglobin level was &gt;11g/dL before enrolment. However, For those women who had a hemoglobin concentration &lt;11gm/dL at the beginning, the rise in hemoglobin concentration was significantly greater at the end in the daily supplemented group as compared to the weekly group (1.44±1.51 gm/dl vs. 0.12±1.05 gm/dl, p=0.015). Although when the changes in the serum ferritin level which occurred in each group were compared, there was no significant difference (p=0.415) between the two intervention groups.</p> <p>Conclusions: These results suggest, daily or weekly iron supplementation is equally effective for healthy pregnant women without anemia.</p> Shrikrishna Kumar Agrawal, Monika Jindal Copyright (c) 2020 Author (s). Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://obstetrics.medresearch.in/index.php/joog/article/view/102 Tue, 26 May 2020 18:05:58 +0000 A study on awareness and behavior of women towards contraceptive use among women attending tertiary care center in northern Andhra Pradesh, India https://obstetrics.medresearch.in/index.php/joog/article/view/111 <p>Background: In spite of the constant efforts by the government, the unmet need for contraception (12.8% in 2006 WHO report) is still there. There are many social factors, taboos, myths, and ignorance, which is responsible for the underutilization of contraceptive services. This leads to many unwanted pregnancies causing maternal morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge, attitude, practices, and behavior of women regarding various contraceptive methods.</p> <p>Material and Methods: It was a cross-sectional study of 1244 married women attending gynaecology OPD of Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh (India). All participants were interviewed with a predesigned proforma.</p> <p>Results: Almost 88.5% of women were from a rural area and more than one-third were illiterate, belonging to low socioeconomic status. Awareness level about contraceptive methods was 92.3% among the participants and almost all of them knew about barriers and oral pills. The main source of knowledge was Healthcare Workers followed by media and social circles. Approximately 43.5% were currently using one or the other method of contraception. The barrier method was the most commonly used. The main reason for not using contraception was Desirous for Conception.</p> <p>Conclusion: There is a need to create awareness about the benefits of contraception.</p> Daneti Sridhar, Mandugavalasa Swarnalatha Copyright (c) 2020 Author (s). Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://obstetrics.medresearch.in/index.php/joog/article/view/111 Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000