Cutaneous manifestation in pregnancy
Mahendra1,
Peta B.2, Vijaya Lakshmi3
1Dr. Mahendra, Associate Professor, 2Dr.
Bharathi Peta, Post Graduate. 3Prof. Dr. Vijaya Lakshmi, Professor
and HOD, all authors are affiliated with Department of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, Adichunchungiri Institute of Medical Science, Mandya, Karnataka, India
Corresponding
author: Dr. Bharathi Peta, Post Graduate, Department of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adichunchungiri Institute of Medical Science, Mandya, Karnataka, India, Email:
bharathipeta@gmail.com.
Abstract
Back ground: During pregnancy there is immunologic,
metabolic, endocrine and vascular changes responsible for physiological and
pathological skin changes. Aims and
Objectives: The objectives of the study to determine the pattern of the
skin changes associated withpregnancy and to examine in detail both
physiological and specific dermatosis. To identify the various clinical types
of pregnancyspecific physiological changes and to know the proportion of these
cutaneous manifestation in pregnant women. Materials
and Method: The study was a cross sectional study carried out at the out
patient department of gynaecological and obstetrics at Adhichunchanagiri Institute
of Medical Sciences, Bellur, Karnataka. Study was a period of 6 months. A total
of 200 pregnant females, irrespective of their parity and gestational age were
examined for any dermatological complaint.Result:
The age of the study population ranged from 17 to 39 years (mean=24years), the
study population included 200, (60%) primigravida, 40% multigravida. Skin
changes were grouped in to: physiological changes (all cases), other dermatoses
affected by pregnancy (80 cases), specific dermatoses (20 cases). Most common
physiological changes were pigmentary alteration 184 cases (92%), followed by
straie seen in 172 cases (86%). Of the various specific dermatoses of
pregnancy, Pruritic utricarial papules and plaques of pregnancy was the most
common disorder (13 cases), followed by Pruritus gravidarum (6 cases). The most
common dermatoses affected by pregnancy Vulvovaginal candidiasis (30 cases),
acne vulgaris (20 cases), eczemas (10 cases). Conclusion: Pregnant women are prone to suffer from a wide range of
dermatological problems apart from specific dermatoses of pregnancy. The study
emphasizes the need for a detailed and meticulous examination of these patients
to detect various disorders.
Keywords: Pregnancy dermatoses, Specific dermatoses, Pruritus
gravidarum
Author Corrected: 24th September 2018 Accepted for Publication: 30th September 2018
Introduction
In pregnancy cutaneous changes results from altered metabolic,
immunological and endocrine factors. These changes are the positive adaptation
of mother to accommodate and support the fetus as it develops through gestation
[1]. Physiological skin changes in pregnancy include changes in pigmentation,
alteration in connective tissue, vascular system as well as changes in hairs
and nails [2]. Some skin eruptions are specific to pregnancy and are called
pregnancy specific dermatosis.Along with this, the pre-existing skin conditions
may either improve or exacerbate in pregnancy due to immunological changes in
pregnancy. As cell mediated immunity is depressed during normal pregnancy, this
accounts for increased severity and frequency of skin infections as candidiasis.
However, detailed reports encompassing the physiological changes and specific
dermatoses of pregnancy and its effects of various dermatoses on these women
are scanty in literature. Many studies have focused on a particular dermatosis
or other diseases and condition related to pregnancy [1,2]. Existing studies
show a wide range of variations in the incidence of Specific dermatoses of
pregnancy. For these reasons, a clinical study was conducted to study both
physiological changes and specific dermatoses of pregnancy.
The detailed reports encompassing the physiological changes and
pregnancy specific dermatosis and effects of various dermatosis on pregnant
women are scanty in literature. Correct diagnosis is important for management
and also for prognosis because some of the skin disorderslike Pemphigiod
gestation are associated with fetal risk. For thisreasons a clinical study was
conducted to study both physiological changes and pregnancy specific
dermatosis.
Materials and Methods
An observational cross-sectional study was conducted, which included 200
consecutive pregnant women attending the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department
of Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Science, Karnataka. Ethics Committee
clearance and informed consent of patients were obtained.
Inclusion Criteria: All pregnant women
having symptoms related to skin and mucosa
Exclusion Criteria: Medical disorders
associated with skin lesions
Drug reactions: A total of 200
patients were included in this study for a period of 6 months. The age of our
study population ranged from 17years to 39years, with a majority being in the
23–25-year age group.Detailed history of patients including chief complaint of
itching and skin lesions, onsetin relation to duration to pregnancy, vaginal
discharge.Detailed medical history andexamination, Obstetric detailssuch as
period of gestation and obstetric score were also noted.
Detailed dermatological examination was performed for patients to look
for physiological changes and specific dermatoses. In case of specific
dermatosesthe morphology of skin lesions, distribution,and site involved were
studied. The diagnosis was based mainly on clinical grounds, history of a
pre-existing skin disease also noted a routine examination of blood and urine
and serology were done in all cases.
Results
Most cases were primigravida 120(60%); 80 (40%) were
multigravida.Commonest physiological changes encountered was Pigmentary
184 (92%), followed by Stria 172(86%)(Table 1).
Table-1: Physiological changes in pregnancy
Physiological changes |
No.of patient out
of 200 |
Percentage(%) |
1.
Pigmentary changes |
184 |
92 |
2.
Striae distensae |
172 |
86 |
3.
Linea Nigra |
176 |
88 |
4.
Melasma |
24 |
12 |
5.
Non pittingoedema of feet |
21 |
10.5 |
6.
Venous varicosities |
4 |
2 |
7.
Pregnancy gingivitis |
5 |
2.5 |
8.
Montgomery’s tubercles |
12 |
6 |
9.
Palmars erythema |
0 |
0 |
In Specific
dermatoses of pregnancy, Pruritic urticarial papules & plaques of pregnancy
13(6.5%) isthe commonest followed by Prurutis gravidarum 6 (3%) and Intrahepatic
cholestasis of pregnancy 1 (0.5%) (Table 2).
Table-2:Specific dermatoses
of pregnancy
Type of Specific dermatoses of pregnancy |
No.of Cases out of 200 |
Percentage (%) |
Polymorphic eruption of
pregnancy (PEP) (Pruritic urticarial
papules & plaques of pregnancy Toxic erythema of
pregnancy) |
13 |
6.5 |
Atopic eruption of
pregnancy (AEP) Prurigo of Pregnancy Pruritic folliculitis of
pregnancy) |
6 |
3 |
Pemphigoid gestations
(PG)/ Herpes gestationis |
0 |
0 |
Intrahepatic Cholestasis
Pregnancy (ICP) (Obstetric cholestasis Pruritus/ Prurigo
gravidarum) |
1 |
0.5 |
Skindisease affected by pregnancy includes
Vulvovaginal candidiasis 30(15%), Eczema 10(5%), Acne vulgaris 20(10%)
Tineaversicolor 5(2.5%), Scabies 5(2.5%) (Table 3).
Table-3: Disease affected by pregnancy
Type of dermatological disease |
No.of cases out of
200 |
Percentage(%) |
1.Acne
vulgaris |
20 |
10 |
2.Eczema |
10 |
5 |
3.Scabies |
5 |
2.5 |
4.Herpes
zoster |
4 |
2 |
5.Tinea
versicolor |
5 |
2.5 |
6.Pityriasis
rosea |
5 |
2.5 |
7.Vulvovaginal
candidiasis |
30 |
15 |
8.Itchyosis
vulgaris |
1 |
0.5 |
Discussion
Pregnancy is a unique physiological state characterized by metabolic,
immunologic, and hormonal readjustments. These make a pregnant woman vulnerable
to all dermatoses occurring in the nonpregnant state and also to certain
eruptions related to the physiologic burden of gestation. Many of the symptoms
and signs are so common that they are not usually considered as being abnormal,
but regarded as physiological and can sometimes provide contributory evidence
of pregnancy [4]. The most common physiological changes are pigmentalterations,
stretch marks, vascular changes and Telogen effluvium [3].
In this study, most women 184(92%) experienced physiological changes. In
a study by Kumari et al[4], physiological changes were observed in all patients
studied(100%). In the study by Raj et al [5], which included 1175 pregnant
women, only 114 (9.7%) experienced some skin changes.Among the physiological
changes, the most common was hyperpigmentation seen in 526 (87.67%) cases.
The mostcommon pattern was lineanigra (fig.1) seen in 87.67% of the
patients. Even in the study by Kumari et al[4], the most common pattern of
hyperpigmentation was reported to be lineanigra, which was noted in 91.4% of
the patients. In our study, pigmentchangeswere seen in 92% of the cases.Melasma
(fig.2) was found in 12% of the patients in our study.Raj et al [5] observed
melasma in 10/1175 (8.5%) cases and Kumari et al [4] reported an incidence of
2.5%. The frequency of striae gravidarum (fig.3) was 86% in our study. The
atrophic form of striae was common among multigravidas (76.95%), whereas the
purplish form was common among primigravidas (45.67%). Shivakumar and
Madhavamurthy [6] reported a frequency of 66.47% for atrophic striae.Kumari et al[4] reported that striae were seen in 484
(79.7%) cases, of which 217 (44.8%) were primigravidas and 267 (55.2%) were
multigravidas.
Vascular changes are congruent with pregnancy because the gravid state
increases blood volume, vascular dilatation, capillary permeability, and
neovascularization, a process believed to be related to the increase in
estrogen and angiogenicfactors. Vascular changes seen in our study include
nonpitting edema of feet in 10.5% of the cases and venous varicosities (fig.4)
in 2% of the cases.No cases of palmar erythema were seen in our study. Raj.et
al. [5] reported the prevalence of palmar erythema to be 33.3%.Pregnancy
gingivitis is due to hormonal changes as well as local Irritation, nutritional
deficiencies may also be responsible [3].It was seen in 5/200 patients in our
study. In a study by Muzzaffar et al. [7], 23/140 (16.4%) had gingival edema
and redness.
Increased appearance of Montgomery’s tubercles is wellknown during
pregnancy in 30–50% of pregnantwomen [3]. In our study, Montgomery’s tubercles
were seen in 6% of the patients.
An increased frequency of infection was seen in our study, which is
common during pregnancy andis probably related to low cellular immunity. During
pregnancy, the cells of the hyperplastic vaginal epithelium get filled with
glycogen, desquamate,and contribute to low vaginal acidity, thereby creating an
environment suitable for growth of Candida.We found vulvovaginal candidiasis in
15% of patients, Other infections seen were tinea versicolor (2.5%),
scabies(2.5%), pityriasis rosea (2.5%), and acne vulgaris (10%).
Nail changes such as brittleness, subungual hyperkeratosis, oncholysis
and leuconychia have been reported during pregnancy. However, no significant
nail changes in pregnant females were observed in our study.
Specific dermatoses of pregnancy represent a heterogeneous group of
ill-defined pruritic skin diseases unique to pregnancy. Holmes and Black [11]
proposed a simplified clinical classification of the specific dermatoses of
pregnancy. This classification basically subdivided the specific dermatoses of
pregnancy into the following four groups: Pemphigoid (herpes) gestation,
Polymorphic eruption of pregnancy, Prurigo of pregnancy,Pruritic folliculitis
of pregnancy [11].
Based on the study conducted by Ambros-Rudolph et. Al[12] on 505 pregnant
patients, a new classification has been proposed and introduced a new term
called ‘‘atopic eruption of pregnancy,” which covers all patients formerly
diagnosed as having prurigo of pregnancy, pruritic folliculitis, and eczema of
pregnancy. The incidence of these specific disorders of pregnancy is 0.5–3.0%
[8].In our study of 200 women, 20 (10%) cases of specific dermatoses were seen.
Of these, the most common was polymorphic eruption of pregnancy is 13cases
(6.5%)(fig.5) Two recent studies from India (9,13) reported a higher
prevalence, with PEP being the most common PSDs in their respective studies.
PEP ocuurs in 1 of 160- 240 pregnancies and is more common in white women [14].
It occurs classically in primigravida duringthe third trimester of pregnancy or
occasionally postpartum and does not reoccur in subsequent pregnancies.
Incidence of PEP is higher in multiple gestation. All the affected patients in
our study were primigravida and all carried single gestationpregancies.
In the study by Shivakumar and Madhavamurthy[6], 16 (9.4%) patients had
prurigo of pregnancy, six (3.52%) had pruritus gravidarum,and four (2.35%) had
polymorphic eruption. In the study by Kumari et al[4], the incidence of specific
dermatoses was 3.6%. In a recent Indian study by Puri and Puri [9], the
commonest pregnancy-related dermatoses were polymorphic eruption of pregnancy
(22%), prurigo of pregnancy (7%), pemphigoid gestation (3%), pruritic
folliculitis of pregnancy (2%), and intra hepatic cholestasis (1%).Another
Indian study, however, reported the commonpregnancy-specific dermatoses to be
prurigo of pregnancy[10].
Conclusion
Physiological dermatoses are common in primigravida compared
to multigravida. Infective dermatosis during pregnancy should be diagnosed
at the earliest to prevent morbidity during antenatal period. Specific
dermatoses of pregnancy are also not uncommon, can be a source of significant
distress to the patients which warrants specific care in turn influences the
maternal and fetal outcome. The awareness, recognition of these skin
conditions, familiarity with their treatment, antepartum surveillance, early
diagnosis and prompt treatment is essential for improving maternal and fetal
prognosis thus minimizes their morbidity.
Fetal risks have only been associated with PG and ICP, but with the
overlappingsymptoms between the diseases pruritis in pregnancy should never be
neglected. Interdisciplinary management involving dermatologists,
pediatricians, obstetricians, and gastroenterologists is mandatory to acquire a
better outcome for the mother and the fetus.
References